How did they do this? They did what they have always done. That “solution” was the rejection of all environmental regulations like Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030, something they actually wanted all along.īut, the elite knew that they would have to go even further to insure their success.They would have to destroy the credibility of their opposition (environmental scientists and the rest of humanity).įirst, they had to create the illusion that science and math were completely wrong and that no problem even existed for which a remedy should be provided in the first place. Then, the elite offered the protesting masses a “solution” which actually served their own interests, rather than the interests of all mankind. This was done to create a fake “problem” to which the masses predictably “reacted” in propest. So, the elite generated and released sufficient evidence into society which created the illusion that they themselves (rather than their opponents) were the driving force behind Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030, something that is not actually so. The elite realized that a growing percentage of society had become increasingly alarmed by their manipulation and control over society. They engineered a “hegelian dialectic”, a “problem-reaction-solution” scam not unlike 9/11 or Operation Northwoods. In the case of Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030, the elite engineered a “false flag” psyop to manipulate and control the opposition. Instead, the elite fund the falsification of the underlying raw data and the creation of favorable taking points long before they ever reach the media personality who incorporates them into their own work. James Corbett is not taking money from the elite. I do not use videos or recommend them to others. So, in my own work, I use only original documents as evidence and as proof of facts. In my world, evidence is the underlying raw data long before it ever gets to a media personality to incorporate into their work. Instead, I use videos only to show a charlatan’s lies on camera. Indeed, in my own work, I do not use videos to establish the truth for that very reason. Unless such media personalities are themselves the scientists who actually gathered all the underlying raw data and who actually prepared the underlying scientific studies used as proof, these media personalities are merely middlemen whose claims are hearsay at best and spin at worst. In my world, evidence is not a video reflecting the claims of a media personality like James Corbett, Rosa Koire or Deborah Tavares. Well-meaning and often absolutely correct in my view.īut, you and I have a different understanding of what documents constitute evidence of facts, much less of what documents constitute proof of facts. YOUR COMMENT You insinuated James Corbett, an independent, people funded activist, commentator, researcher and documentary filmmaker, is taking money from Big Oil, My own work is about documents and documents only. The subject of the pros and cons of global environmental regulation is really off topic for me. This will be my final comment on this subject before I get back to my work on the documents used by Deborah Tavares.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |